Are You Problem-Oriented or Solution-Seeking?


Take a minute to consider the questions that consume your workday.

Amy Leadership Lens

by Amy JacksonSVP Product Leader, Compensation Management

As compensation professionals, we’ve built our expertise around answering complex questions. However, there’s a fundamental pattern we need to examine: The nature of the questions we spend our days answering reveals whether we’re operating from a problem-oriented or solution-oriented mindset. That distinction reshapes not just our work, but also our future career opportunities and professional fulfillment.

Walk through any health system’s compensation department and you’ll hear the questions that drain energy and perpetuate reactive cycles:

  • Why are we always cutting it so close on deadlines?
  • Who made this calculation error?
  • Why are there so many exceptions built into this plan?
  • Why don’t clinicians understand their compensation?
  • Why can’t we get clean data from the source systems?

These questions focus on analyzing causes, identifying obstacles, and dwelling on the “why” behind our challenges. They pull us into past and present problems, creating an energy-depleting cycle that often leads to feelings of frustration and professional stagnation.

Here’s what we need to examine more closely: How many of these questions should actually be consuming human intellectual capacity in 2026?

This is where we need to practice intellectual honesty. When we map our daily questions against what intelligent technology can now address automatically, a clear pattern emerges:

  • “Why are calculations wrong?” → Technology should ensure accuracy through automated validation
  • “Why are deadlines missed?” → Technology should orchestrate workflows proactively
  • “Why is data inconsistent?” → Technology should handle ingestion with auto-detection and validation
  • “Why are reports delayed?” → Technology should generate insights automatically

The uncomfortable truth is that many problem-oriented questions we’re answering manually represent intellectual work that technology should be handling. We’ve been solving problems that shouldn’t require human problem-solving.

Research consistently demonstrates that solution-oriented thinking – concentrating on generating ideas, taking action, and creating desired future outcomes – builds optimism, resilience, and professional satisfaction. When intelligent automation handles the problem-oriented work, compensation professionals can shift to questions that leverage uniquely human strategic thinking:

  • How can we align compensation strategy with clinical quality initiatives?
  • What compensation models would attract the specialists we need?
  • How should we structure incentives to support our strategic priorities?
  • What insights do we need to present to the board next month?
  • How can we design plans that clinicians find both motivating and comprehensible?

These are future-focused, action-oriented questions that position you as a strategic advisor rather than a reactive problem-solver.

Here’s what requires vulnerability to acknowledge: This shift challenges the professional identity many of us have built around being excellent at problem-solving.

We’ve derived satisfaction and recognition from our ability to troubleshoot complex calculation errors, manage crisis deadlines, and navigate data inconsistencies. However, industry pressures and technological advancement require the discomfort of examining whether our current approach serves our future professional selves.

The question isn’t whether we’re good at solving problems – it’s whether we want to build our careers around problems that technology should be (and will be) solving.

Imagine yourself in a role focused on solution-oriented strategic work. Your days become populated with questions like:

  • Based on productivity patterns, which compensation model would optimize both clinician satisfaction and organizational goals?
  • What strategic insights should we surface for leadership’s quarterly planning session?
  • How should we structure this new service line’s compensation to support our market positioning?
  • What proactive recommendations can we make based on emerging compensation trends?

These questions require human expertise, strategic thinking, and domain knowledge. They cannot be automated, but they also cannot be asked when all human capacity is consumed by problem-oriented firefighting.

The shift from problem-oriented to solution-oriented work isn’t just about technology – it’s about professional evolution. It requires examining our relationship with the types of questions that define our days and having the courage to embrace change and elevate our focus to questions that create strategic value.

The organizations that make this transition successfully can implement better software while also transforming their compensation teams from reactive problem-solvers into proactive strategic advisors. The questions that consume their days will then reflect not what went wrong yesterday, but what strategic opportunities exist tomorrow.

The question for reflection: What questions do you want to be answering a year from now?


Our innovative Compensation Management platform can help!

Recommended For You